Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life as well as the importance of maintaining regulation and order in society.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to really make it suitable to your facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified via the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Note: Please fill any subject and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave field blank.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques utilized by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological features allows for your more comprehensive legal response.
Let’s deal with what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
In any society, the enforcement of law and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the most severe crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is essential to make sure justice prevails.
Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter towards the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
Please note, If you're seeking a cost exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Case legislation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is important for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to those resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and promoting transparency.
1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence as well as separation of powers.
Section 489-F of website your Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and coins. Its primary objective would be to curb counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity of your national currency.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and identified researchers to review and rule on long run grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.